CTKArch · Forums
Viewing profile for ArchieBunker
ArchieBunker
 
Login to contact | |
|
General
Joined: 2011-09-27Posts made: 4Homepage: Status:
Email: not publicLocation: Canada |
Contact
 IRC: Jabber: |
|
ArchieBunker's Signature:
"The BSD things in life are Free"
|
|
In forum "Community"
In topic "Welcome to the CTKArch Forums!"
|
|---|
|
Hi all, Bienvenue  Unfortuately my french is extremely limited, even my English is full of typos, Lol But well, 1st of all, great work on the CTKArch <- Thankyou. I came to CTKArch becuase I wanted to know how "cp2ram" really worked, and I guess I found the source of it. That is such a cool script... Salut ! A little introduction: I'm not new to Unix, many moons ago I was a Sun/Solaris sys admin, alas, those days are long gone now, in fact so has Sun Microsystems  But I really like Arch with it's simplicity and BSD-style init scripting, which is about as close as I will get these days to my older Solaris. Thanks again, and I hope CTKarch continues it's long and healthy life. |
Quote: Calimero at Sep 27, 2011 7:53:56 am btw: will "Copy to ram" still work ok with the new Arch kernel 3.* ? (whenever you finally realease a new CTKarch 0.8 with a stable 3.* kernel). I heard that aufs2 will be dropped, and will this impact in any way the ability to copy to ram, similar to how ctkarch has done it in the past. ? Excuse me, but I'm just trying to understand this all, a bit more. In fact, I may be way off here. 
Thankyou again. Rick. |
In topic "What distribution did you come from?"
|
|
... ALL of them.
I can't afford a "real" powerful MAC, so Arch Linux on a PC* is the next best thing -Desktop-wise. :) |
In forum "Suggestions"
In topic "NetworkManager instead of Wicd"
|
|---|
|
I heard that NM (networkmanager) had a smaller memory footprint, and larger dirver support, once it's loaded, than wicd ?
but, whatever is better, in the long run, right? |
Powered by myUPB v2.2.7 ·
PHP Outburst
PHP Outburst